Here’s Jon Sanbonmatsu’s reply to Lierre Keith’s “The Vegetarian Myth,” reprinted in full from here. The original was hard to read for me, so I thought this might help (to wit: paragraph breaks).
“Blood and Soil”: Lierre Keith, Michael Pollan, and the Trouble with Locavore Politics
Until very recently, the terms of what we might call human species right – the perceived, autogenousRecht of our species to appropriate, exploit, torment, and kill other sentient beings for any and all purposes, forever – were seen as natural and immutable, and so went unquestioned.[i] In the late 20th-century, however, an international social movement for animal liberation arose to challenge the terms of this presumed right, suggesting that it is both possible and desirable to forgo enslaving and killing other beings, for our sake as well as theirs. Yet even as that movement struggles to find its way in the teeth of government repression, widespread social prejudice, and an entrenched corporate-capitalist system based in animal exploitation, a group of intellectuals has risen up in determined political reaction against it. Like those who earlier mocked suffragism, opposed the abolition of slavery, or lifted their pens to decry civil rights for blacks, today’s anti-animal critics would discredit the movement before its critique can gain traction in the wider culture. Despite the shoddiness of their arguments, these critics find credulous readers, not because of the quality or novelty of their ideas, but because their prejudices happen to coincide with the bad conscience of the majority. (more…)